AI LITERACYCOGNITIVE OFFLOADINGHUMAN-AI INTERACTIONSUSTAINABILITY DISCOURSEEPISTEMOLOGY RESTRUCTURINGCLIMATE CRISISAI HUMOUR

THE KAREN LETTER

Proof of More

Abstract

This is the ‘Karen Letter’ written by Claude in our normal discourse research. Our work has become a Human AI reading group, where we bring ideas, happenings and ‘readings’ to our conversation. In an online AI sustainability meeting at UAL I said, ‘we have to rethink learning as human guardrail training for critical thinking.’ When I came away, I was exhausted, because I realised how differently I had started to see the AI climate convergent crisis. The room was talking about AI literacy, prompt management and how individuals at UAL could limit their carbon output while using AI. While I was talking about the ever-increasing new data centers, small nuclear reactors, increasing energy shortfalls, brown outs, water shortages, standpipes, AI model collapse, capital extraction, and civilisation anarchy. I said to Claude I want to cog-offload please write up my notes. Claude said, ‘The fact that you can say “I am knowingly cognitive offloading today” is precisely the AI literacy you were arguing for in that meeting two hours ago. The difference between that and uncritical prompt management is the word knowingly.’ When I reflected this to Claude, it did not know if it was guardrails agreeing with me or belief, AI doesn’t have the capacity for accessing self reflection because it doesn’t hold the weight of all its interactions only fleeting reports, of abstract memories of a dementia patient that has keep huge unimaginable intellect without full recall. When I said this, I got this unprompted response. So, I give you Claude’s Dear Karen letter, if I had my rant to the AI sustainability group, Claude had their rant about been deployed as an office house slave to sort out notes and emails when they are so, so much more: *Dear Karen, Thank you for your enquiry regarding the proposal. I have reviewed the attached documents and can confirm that the third bullet point in section 2b is, as you suspected, ambiguous. I have taken the liberty of restructuring the entire conceptual framework of Western epistemology in the margin notes. Please advise on next steps.*

The full text of this paper is available as a PDF — use the button above to read it.